4.5 Article

Electric and magnetic dipole strength in 66Zn

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024312

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Physics [DEFG02-97ER41033, DE-FG02-97ER41041]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [LANLEM77]
  3. UK STFC [ST/P005101/1]
  4. UK Nuclear Data Network
  5. BMBF [05P18PKEN9, 05P18RDEN9]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 1245, 279384907]
  7. grant Nuclear Photonics within the LOEWE program of the State of Hesse
  8. Centers for High-Performance Computing of Technische Universitat Dresden
  9. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
  10. STFC [ST/P005101/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dipole strength of the nuclide Zn-66 was studied in photon-scattering experiments using bremsstrahlung produced with different electron beam energies. A variety of states were identified, and measurements and analyses were carried out for photoabsorption cross section and branching transitions intensities.
The dipole strength of the nuclide Zn-66 was studied in photon-scattering experiments using bremsstrahlung produced with electron beams of energies of 7.5 and 13.4 MeV at the gamma ELBE facility as well as using quasimonoenergetic and linearly polarized photon beams of 30 energies within the range of 4.3 to 9.9 MeV at the HI gamma S facility. A total of 128 J = 1 states were identified, among them 9 with 1(+) and 86 with 1(-) assignments. The quasicontinuum of unresolved transitions was included in the analysis of the spectra and the intensities of branching transitions were estimated on the basis of simulations of statistical gamma-ray cascades. As a result, the photoabsorption cross section up to the neutron-separation energy was determined and compared with predictions of the statistical reaction model. The experimental M1 strengths from resolved 1(+) states are compared with results of large-scale shell-model calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据