4.8 Article

Real-time imaging of surface chemical reactions by electrochemical photothermal reflectance microscopy

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 1930-1936

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc05132b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Keck Foundation
  2. Xiamen University postdoctoral fellowship - NSFC [2163000117, 21621091, 21790354]
  3. MOST [2016YFA0200601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EPRM technique utilizes a potential-dependent nonlinear photothermal signal to map electrochemical processes with sub-micron spatial resolution, revealing the evolution of surface species on the Pt surface. It allows for real-time imaging with a faster imaging speed, enabling broad applications in catalysis, energy storage, and light harvest systems.
Traditional electrochemical measurements based on either current or potential responses only present the average contribution of an entire electrode's surface. Here, we present an electrochemical photothermal reflectance microscope (EPRM) in which a potential-dependent nonlinear photothermal signal is exploited to map an electrochemical process with sub-micron spatial resolution. By using EPRM, we are able to monitor the photothermal signal of a Pt electrode during the electrochemical reaction at an imaging speed of 0.3 s per frame. The potential-dependent photothermal signal, which is sensitive to the free electron density, clearly revealed the evolution of surface species on the Pt surface. Our results agreed well with the reported spectroelectrochemical techniques under similar conditions but with a much faster imaging speed. We further mapped the potential oscillation during the oxidation of formic acid on the Pt surface. The photothermal images from the Pt electrode well matched the potential change. This technique opens new prospects for real-time imaging of surface chemical reaction to reveal the heterogeneity of electrochemical reactivity, which enables broad applications to the study of catalysis, energy storage, and light harvest systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据