4.7 Article

The dual-defect passivation role of lithium bromide doping in reducing the nonradiative loss in CsPbX3 (X = Br and I) quantum dots

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 658-668

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0qi01262a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint Fund [U1902222]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11774138, 11664022, 51862020, 11804255]
  3. Foundation of Yunnan Province [2019HC016]
  4. Kunming University of Science and Technology [KKSY201632046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, LiBr was utilized as a dual-defect passivation agent in colloidal CsPbX3 (X = Br and I) quantum dots, leading to a successful reduction of non-radiative recombination. The appropriate concentration of LiBr not only passivated halide vacancies and thermal defects to reduce non-radiative recombination, but also improved the phase stability caused by halide migration.
The non-radiative loss in a perovskite, mainly resulting from thermal defects and halogen vacancies, has always been an important factor affecting its luminescence properties. The addition of a lithium ion has been demonstrated to be an effective way to reduce the nonradiative recombination in perovskite films, mainly acting on the surface/interface of the films. However, few studies have focused on its role in colloidal quantum dots. Herein, we have used LiBr as a new dual-defect passivation agent in colloidal CsPbX3 (X = Br and I) quantum dots to reduce the capture ability of the defects for excited electrons, leading to an effective reduction of the non-radiative recombination. The mechanism of LiBr doping in CsPbX3 (X = Br and I) quantum dots was studied by exploring its photodynamic process at room temperature and low temperature. Our results show that an appropriate concentration of LiBr can not only passivate the halide vacancy and thermal defect to reduce the nonradiative recombination, but also improve the phase stability caused by halide migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据