4.6 Article

Risk assessment on-a-chip: a cell-based microfluidic device for immunotoxicity screening

期刊

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 682-691

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0na00857e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Probing Biosystem Future Science Platform
  2. Australian Research Council Training Centre for Personalised Therapeutics Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new microfluidic-based cell biochip device for evaluating the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles on human B lymphocytes. The results suggest that the administration of silver nanoparticles under fluid flow conditions may enhance cell-nanoparticle interactions and increase toxicity.
Nanomaterials are widely used in industrial and clinical settings due to their unique physical and chemical properties. However, public health and environmental concerns have emerged owing to their undesired toxicity and ability to trigger immune responses. This paper presents the development of a microfluidic-based cell biochip device that enables the administration of nanoparticles under laminar flow to cells of the immune system to assess their cytotoxicity. The exposure of human B lymphocytes to 10 nm silver nanoparticles under fluid flow led to a 3-fold increase in toxicity compared to static conditions, possibly indicating enhanced cell-nanoparticle interactions. To investigate whether the administration under flow was the main contributing factor, we compared and validated the cytotoxicity of the same nanoparticles in different platforms, including the conventional well plate format and in-house fabricated microfluidic devices under both static and dynamic flow conditions. Our results suggest that commonly employed static platforms might not be well-suited to perform toxicological screening of nanomaterials and may lead to an underestimation of cytotoxic responses. The simplicity of the developed flow system makes this setup a valuable tool to preliminary screen nanomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据