4.2 Article

Exploring the dynamics of Zr-based metal-organic frameworks containing mechanically interlocked molecular shuttles

期刊

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 358-370

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0fd00004c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. NSERC
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Ontario Innovation Trust
  5. University of Windsor
  6. Florida State University
  7. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory
  8. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through a Canada Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two Zr(IV) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were studied, incorporating a new H-shaped tetracarboxylate linker with [2]rotaxane molecular shuttles. Solid-state NMR and solution NMR spectra confirmed the successful incorporation of the [2]rotaxanes, while the study found that the structure of the linker affects the shuttling rate of the macrocyclic ring.
Zr(iv) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) UiO-68 and PCN-57, containing triphenylene dicarboxylate (TPDC) and tetramethyl-triphenylene dicarboxylate (TTDC) linkers, respectively, were doped with an H-shaped tetracarboxylate linker that contains a [2]rotaxane molecular shuttle. The new MOFs, UWDM-8 and UWDM-9, contain a [2]rotaxane crossbar spanning the tetrahedral cavities of the fcu topology while the octahedral cavities remain empty. C-13 solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectra and solution H-1 NMR spectra verified that the [2]rotaxanes were included as designed. Variable-temperature (VT) cross polarization (CP) magic-angle spinning (MAS) C-13 SSNMR was used to explore the translational motion of the macrocyclic ring in both MOFs. The SSNMR results clearly show that the structure of the linker (TPDCvs.TTDC) affects the shuttling rate of the macrocyclic ring, although questions remain as to how rotation of the central phenylene unit of the strut might also affect the motion of the macrocycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据