4.7 Article

The Jevons paradox unravelled: A multi-level typology of rebound effects and mechanisms

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101982

关键词

Rebound effect; Rebound mechanism; Rebound mitigation policy; Energy efficiency; Typology; Taxonomy

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01UT1702A, 01UU1607B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Literature on the rebound phenomenon has grown significantly over the last decade, but is characterized by diverse definitions, discrepancies in empirical estimates and policy proposals. This article develops a novel typology that differentiates between rebound mechanisms and effects, aiming to establish common ground for future research and policy development.
Literature on the rebound phenomenon has grown significantly over the last decade. However, the field is characterized by diverse and ambiguous definitions and by substantial discrepancies in empirical estimates and policy proposals. As a result, cumulative knowledge production is difficult. To address these issues, this article develops a novel typology. Based on a critical review of existing classifications, the typology introduces an important differentiation between the rebound mechanisms, which generate changes in energy consumption, and the rebound effects, which describe the size of such changes. Both rebound mechanisms and rebound effects can be analytically related to four economic levels - micro, meso, macro and global - and two time frames - short run and long run. The typology is populated with eighteen rebound mechanisms from the literature. This contribution is the first that transparently describes its criteria and methodology for developing a rebound typology and that gives clear definitions of all terms involved. The resulting rebound typology aims to establish common conceptual ground for future research on the rebound phenomenon and for developing rebound mitigation policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据