4.7 Article

Financial inclusion and energy poverty: Empirical evidence from Ghana

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105085

关键词

Energy poverty; Financial inclusion; Consumption poverty; Education; Household income

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effect of financial inclusion on energy poverty in Ghana using multidimensional measures, finding that an increase in financial inclusion is associated with a decrease in household energy poverty. Results show consistency across different quasi-experimental methods, with a more significant impact on rural and male-headed households. Consumption poverty and household net income are identified as potential channels through which financial inclusion influences energy poverty.
With myriads of policy options being considered to alleviate energy poverty, the financial inclusion-energy poverty nexus has received little attention despite its potential. Using two rounds of living standards survey data from Ghana, this study examines the effect of financial inclusion on energy poverty using multidimensional measures. Endogeneity associated with financial inclusion is instrumented using distance to the nearest bank. We found that the share of energy poor households in Ghana reduced slightly from about 81% to 80% between 2012/13 and 2016/17. Our estimates show that a standard deviation increase in financial inclusion is associated with a decrease in household energy poverty between 1.380 and 1.556 standard deviations. This outcome is consistent across different quasi-experimental methods. The results show more consistency for rural and male-headed households. Improvement in financial inclusion is likely to result in the biggest reduction in energy poverty for those in the employee category. We identify consumption poverty and household net income as potential channels through which financial inclusion influences energy poverty. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据