4.0 Article

Image fusion practice to improve the ischemic-stroke-lesion detection for efficient clinical decision making

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1089-1099

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12065-020-00551-0

关键词

Brain abnormality; Ischemic-stroke; Image fusion; Cuckoo search; Thresholding; Segmentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research proposes a new diagnostic method through MRI-based IS assessment and confirms that fusing multi-modal brain MRI slices can improve lesion extraction accuracy, which is crucial for clinical-level disease diagnosis.
In humans, the abnormality in brain arises due to various reasons and the ischemic-stroke (IS) is one of the major brain syndromes to be diagnosed and treated with appropriate procedures. The brain-signals and brain-images are widely considered for the clinical level diagnosis of IS. The proposed research considered the brain-image (MRI) based assessment of IS, due to its accuracy and multi modality nature. The MRI slices with modalities, such as diffusion-weighted (DW), flair and T1 are considered for the assessment. This work implements the following procedures to extract the IS lesion (ISL); (i) pixel level image fusion based on principal-component-analysis (PCA), (ii) image thresholding using cuckoo-search (CS) and Tsallis entropy, (iii) watershed based ISL extraction, and (iv) comparison of segmented ISL with the ground-truth-image (GTI). To confirm the clinical significance of the proposed work, the test images are collected from the benchmark ISLES2015 database. The results of this research confirms that, the fused brain MRI slices with DW and flair (DW + flair) modality facilitate to attain improved mean values of Jaccard-Index (83.17 +/- 7.32%), Dice (88.51 +/- 4.76%) and segmentation accuracy (97.34 +/- 1.62%) compared to other images. This research confirms that, pixel level fusion will help to achieve better result during the clinical level disease diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据