4.0 Article

Using 14C-acetate Pulse-chase Labeling to Study Fatty Acid and Glycerolipid Metabolism in Plant Leaves

期刊

BIO-PROTOCOL
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BIO-PROTOCOL
DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3900

关键词

C-14-acetate pulse-chase; Fatty acid; Lipid

类别

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipids metabolism involves various reactions in different subcellular compartments, and isotopic labeling of acetate is a useful tool to study fatty acid synthesis and complex lipid metabolism in plants and other organisms.
Lipids metabolism is comprised of networks of reactions occurred in different subcellular compartments. Isotopic labeling is a good way to track the transformations and movements of metabolites without perturbing overall cellular metabolism. Fatty acids, the building blocks of membrane lipids and storage triacylglycerols, are synthesized in plastids. The immediate precursor for fatty acid synthesis is acetyl-CoA. Exogenous acetate is rapidly incorporated into fatty acids in leaves and isolated plastids because it can diffuse freely through cellular membranes, enter the plastid where it is rapidly metabolized to acetyl-CoA. Therefore, isotope-labeled acetate is often used as a tracer for the investigation of fatty acid synthesis and complex lipid metabolism in plants and other organisms. The basic principle of isotope labeling and its recent technological advances have been reviewed (Allen et al., 2015). The present protocol describes the use of 14 C-labeled acetate to determine rates of fatty acid synthesis and degradation and to track the metabolism of glycerolipids in leaves. This method, which is often referred to as acetate pulse-chase labeling, has been widely used to probe various aspects of lipid metabolism (Allen et al., 2015), including the role of autophagy in membrane lipid turnover (Fan et al., 2019) and the interplay between lipid and starch metabolism pathways (Yu et al., 2018).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据