4.6 Article

Transparent CsPbBr3 Quantum Dot Photodetector with a Vertical Transistor Structure

期刊

ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 337-343

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.0c00877

关键词

transparent photodetector; transistor; quantum dot; solution-processed; perovskite; orthogonally binary dielectric layer

资金

  1. Shenzhen Municipal Development and Reform Commission
  2. New Energy Technology Engineering Laboratory [SDRC [2016]172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that by effectively controlling the active layer of CsPbBr3 quantum dots, as well as the structural design of the organic blend layer and orthogonally binary dielectric layer, high transparency and gate tunable property of the CsPbBr3 quantum dot photodetector can be achieved. The photodetector has a transparency of up to 93% in the visible light range, with a responsivity of 80 mA/W and a detectivity of 2.2 X 10(11) Jones.
Though flexible and transparent electronics has increasingly attracted attention, there are still challenges in developing vertical phototransistors to obtain photons efficiently and maintaining the gate tunable property of the transparent substrate. The active layers of the CsPbBr3 quantum dot are sandwiched between an organic blend layer of poly-TPD:PCBM (1:1) and an orthogonally binary dielectric layer of polymethyl methacrylate and polyacrylic acid. The energy-favorable interface between the organic blend film and CsPbBr3 quantum dot is used for effective exciton dissociation and charge separation, whereas the orthogonally binary dielectric layer on the transparent indium tin oxide substrate is incorporated for effective gate tunable property. The obtained CsPbBr3 quantum dot-based photodetector has a transparency of up to 93% in the visible light range with a responsivity of 80 mA/W and a detectivity of 2.2 X 10(11) Jones. This work offers pioneering opportunities in emerging wearable optoelectronics for light detection with sensitivity and transparency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据