4.2 Article

Performance-tuning of PVA-based gel electrolytes by acid/PVA ratio and PVA molecular weight

期刊

SN APPLIED SCIENCES
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04182-7

关键词

Gel electrolyte; Poly (vinyl alcohol); Ionic conductivity; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Department of Polymer Engineering & Color Technology, Amirkabir University of Technology in Tehran, Iran
  2. Condensed Matter National Laboratory, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) in Tehran, Iran
  3. Pasargad Institute for Advanced Innovative Solutions (PIAIS) [SG1-RMS1705-01, EI1-MC1709-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a multi-functional gel structure based on PVA and H3PO4 has been shown to achieve high ionic conductivity and good mechanical flexibility, making it a promising solution for the advancement of flexible devices.
The significant breakthroughs of flexible gel electrolytes have attracted extensive attention in modern wearable electronic gadgets. The lack of all-around high-performing gels limits the advantages of such devices for practical applications. To this end, developing a multi-functional gel architecture with superior ionic conductivity while enjoying good mechanical flexibility is a bottleneck to overcome. Herein, an architecturally engineered gel, based on PVA and H3PO4 with different molecular weights of PVA for various PVA/H3PO4 ratios, was developed. The results show the dependence of ionic conductivity on molecular weight and also charge carrier concentration. Consequently, fine-tuning of PVA-based gels through a simple yet systematic and well-regulated strategy to achieve highly ion-conducting gels, with the highest ionic conductivity of 14.75 +/- 1.39 mS cm(-1) have been made to fulfill the requirement of flexible devices. More importantly, gel electrolytes possess good mechanical robustness while exhibiting high-elasticity (%766.66 +/- 59.73), making it an appropriate candidate for flexible devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据