4.6 Article

Self-healing, highly elastic and amphiphilic silicone-based polyurethane for antifouling coatings

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 1384-1394

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tb02465a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673074, 52003082]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M662904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicone elastomer coatings have eco-friendly nature, excellent fouling release ability, and drag-reducing property, but lack mechanical properties and fouling resistance. The reported silicone-based polyurethane with UPy and amphiphilic pendant chains shows significantly improved adhesion strength, self-healing ability, and fouling release performance, promising for high-performance antifouling coatings.
Silicone elastomer coatings have attracted increasing attention owing to their eco-friendly nature, excellent fouling release ability and drag-reducing property. However, the poor mechanical properties and lack of fouling resistance limit their applications. Herein, a silicone-based polyurethane with 2-ureido-4[1H]-pyrimidinone (UPy) and amphiphilic pendant chains is reported. The UPy groups and urethane can form hydrogen bonds with various substrates so that the coating has significantly improved adhesion strength (0.9-3.0 MPa) compared with the PDMS elastomer (0.3-0.4 MPa). Moreover, the quadruple hydrogen bonding between UPy moieties allows the polymer to have excellent self-healing ability and high elasticity. The modified polymeric coating has low surface energy (24 mJ m(-2)) and low elastic modulus (1.9 MPa), so it exhibits good fouling release performance. Besides, the amphiphilic side chains can effectively resist protein adsorption and adhesion of the marine bacteria Pseudomonas sp. and diatom Navicula incerta. The novel design can improve the resistance of silicone coating to biofouling and mechanical forces and is promising for high-performance antifouling coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据