4.6 Review

Recent advances in ultrathin 2D hexagonal boron nitride based gas sensors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 1537-1549

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc05855f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board [IMP/2019/000075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in the field of 2D hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) have sparked scientific interest in this ultrathin material for a wide range of electronic and optoelectronic devices. hBN's high thermal conductivity and temperature stability make it one of the most promising materials for next-generation high-performance gas sensors. This review summarizes the latest developments in hBN-based devices for gas sensing, explains the physics behind hBN-based gas sensors, and discusses challenges in developing practical gas sensors using hBN technology.
The recent advances in the field of 2D hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) for realizing electronic and optoelectronic devices, including wearable and portable devices, have aroused scientific interest in this ultrathin material for a wide range of applications. Its exceptionally high thermal conductivity and temperature stability make it one of the most promising materials for next-generation high-performance gas sensors. Although a number of review articles on hBN have already been published focusing on its synthesis, properties, and functionalities, however, none of them has made a significant contribution to the field of gas sensing. Hence, in this review, we have analytically summarized the state-of-art advances in hBN based devices with a particular emphasis on gas sensors. Moreover, we have also explained the comprehensive physics of hBN based gas sensors. The recent technological advancements to overcome the inherent properties such as poor surface reactivity and low conductivity have also been thoroughly compiled. Finally, we have discussed some of the prominent challenges faced by hBN technology for developing practical gas sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据