4.5 Review

The progress and challenge of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1758835921992968

关键词

immunotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); PD-1; PD-L1 inhibitors; predictive biomarkers; progress and challenges

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802278, 81900563, 81670017, 81960232, 82001282]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ50361, 2020JJ4418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is the standard therapy for NSCLC patients, prolonging survival without significant side effects. However, the lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a challenge for further clinical applications.
The use of programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard therapy for the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast to current traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments can directly attenuate tumour-mediated exhaustion and effectively modulate the host anti-tumour immune response in vivo. In addition, compared with traditional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy can significantly prolong survival without obvious side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Ideally, several biomarkers could be used to monitor the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments; however, the current lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a widespread limitation and challenge for further clinical applications, as does the possibility of immune-related adverse events and drug resistance. In this review, we aimed to summarise the latest progress in anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment of advanced NSCLC, worldwide, including in China. An exploration of underlying biomarker identification and future challenges will be discussed in this article to facilitate translational studies in cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据