4.5 Article

Synthesis, in silico ADME, molecular docking and in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of stilbene linked 1,2,3-triazoles

期刊

HELIYON
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05893

关键词

Wittig reaction; 1,2,3-Triazole; Cytotoxicity; ADME; Molecular docking

资金

  1. Federal funds from the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [75N93019D00005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel (E)-1-benzyl-4-((4-styrylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole compounds were synthesized using Wittig reaction and evaluated for cytotoxicity. Some compounds exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines, while resveratrol linked compounds were more sensitive to leukemia and lymphoma cell lines.
Series of (E)-1-benzyl-4-((4-styrylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles 7a-x were obtained by Wittig reaction between 4-((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)benzaldehydes 5a-d and benzyl triphenyl phosphonium halides 6a-f in benzene. The structures of the synthesized compounds were confirmed by FTIR, NMR (H-1 and C-13 NMR)spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. All synthesized compounds were screened for their cytotoxic activity against human cancer cell lines including pancreatic carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, lung carcinoma, and leukemias such as acute lymphoblastic, chronic myeloid, and non-Hodgkinson lymphoma cell lines. In vitro cytotoxicity data showed that compounds 7c, 7e, 7h, 7j, 7k, 7r, and 7w were moderately cytotoxic (11.6 -19.3 mu M) against the selected cancer cell lines. These cytotoxicity findings were supported using molecular docking studies of the compounds against 1TUB receptor. The drug-likeness properties of the compounds evaluated by in silico ADME analyses. Resveratrol linked 1,2,3-triazoles were more sensitive towards human carcinoma cell lines but least sensitive towards leukemia and lymphoma cell lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据