4.6 Article

One-step carbonization of a nickel-containing nitrogen-doped porous carbon material for electrochemical supercapacitors

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 1822-1833

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nj05283c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Scientific Research Project of Heilongjiang Province [61841504, JMRH201914]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presented a nickel-containing nitrogen-doped porous carbon material, which showed significantly increased specific surface area and excellent specific capacitance after a simple high-temperature treatment. The material has great potential for applications in the field of supercapacitors.
In this study, we report a nickel-containing nitrogen-doped porous carbon material. Before this material is composited using a simple high-temperature treatment, it uses polystyrene microspheres as templates to prepare polyaniline microspheres and nickel ion-containing graphene oxide materials. This preparation method is efficient and convenient. We observed that polystyrene microspheres disappeared during high-temperature treatment, and the formation of a porous structure increased the specific surface area of this material. The prepared polyaniline provides N atoms and adds additional capacitance to the material. Besides, during the high-temperature treatment of graphene oxide containing nickel ions, the electrical properties of the material is further increased due to nickel-metal formation after reducing nickel ions. Hence, the Ni-containing N-doped porous carbon material samples showed good specific capacitance (351 F g(-1)). After 5000 cycles of charge and discharge, the capacitance remained at 92.1%. The calculated energy and power density of the assembled symmetrical supercapacitor were 6.16 W h kg(-1) and 5994 W kg(-1), respectively. Therefore, in the field of supercapacitors, the Ni-containing N-doped porous carbon materials prepared in this paper have a broad application prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据