4.6 Article

A general strategy for embedding ultrasmall CoMx nanocrystals (M = S, O, Se, and Te) in hierarchical porous carbon nanofibers for high-performance potassium storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 1487-1494

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta11273a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22075147]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20180086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a versatile strategy for fabricating hierarchical porous carbon nanofibers with closely coupled Co-based ultrafine nanoparticles and a carbon matrix to achieve high-performance anode materials for potassium-ion batteries.
Closely integrated transition-metal-based compounds/carbon nano-architectures are one of themost promising anodematerials for largescale energy storage applications because of the superior structural stability and the outstanding synergistic effect from the efficient combination of the two components. Herein, a versatile strategy is demonstrated for fabricating hierarchical porous carbon nanofibers (HCFs) with closely coupled Co-based ultrafine nanoparticles and a carbon matrix. The spatially restricted reactions of the synthetic method can not only prevent the agglomeration of the nanoparticles, but also provide extremely tight coupling interaction between CoMx (M = S, O, Se, and Te) nanoparticles and conductive carbon nanofibers. As a proof of concept, the as-fabricated CoS2@HCFs show high reversible capacity, excellent rate property, and ultralong cycling life when evaluated as an anode material for potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). Even after 1000 cycles, the charge capacity can be retained at 268 mA h g(-1) at an elevated current rate of 500 mA g(-1), one of the highest reported performances for Co-based anode materials in PIBs. Thiswork emphasizes the importance of designing andmanufacturing highly functionally coupled hybrid materials for improved energy storage implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据