4.6 Article

Infiltration of cerium into a NiO-YSZ tubular substrate for solid oxide reversible cells using a LSGM electrolyte film

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 1530-1540

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta08564b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan through Japan Society of Promotion Sciences (JSPS) [16H06293]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06293] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that Ce nitrate has a positive effect on improving the performance and stability of solid oxide cells. Infiltration of Ce at higher concentrations led to a significant reduction in IR loss and overpotential, resulting in increased maximum power density.
A NiO-Y2O3 stabilized ZrO2 (NiO-YSZ) supported tubular solid oxide cell, which consists of a La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3-delta (LSGM) dip-coated electrolyte film and Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3-delta (SSC) air electrode, was prepared and its power generation and electrolysis performance in the intermediate temperature range were investigated. Compared to other rare earth oxides studied, infiltration of Ce nitrate into the substrate was the most effective for increasing cell performance in the case of 2 M infiltration. Moreover, it was found that the infiltration of a higher concentration of the Ce solution increased the maximum power density, because both IR loss and overpotential were significantly decreased. The maximum power density of the cell was 0.95 and 0.42 W cm(-2) at 873 and 773 K, respectively at 3 M Ce nitrate infiltration. The long-term stability of the cell was also measured by using the cell infiltrated with 1.5 M Ce, and a stable power generation performance was demonstrated up to 100 h. The steam electrolysis performance of the cell using Ce infiltration was further studied and it was found that Ce also contributes to higher current density in SOEC operation and 1.07 A cm(-2) at 1.6 V was achieved at 873 K using 2 M Ce infiltration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据