4.5 Article

Impact of corporate governance mechanism on IFRS adoption: A comparative study of Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates

期刊

HELIYON
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05848

关键词

Corporate governance mechanisms; Compliance with IFRS; Financial reporting quality; Saudi Arabia; Oman; The United Arab Emirates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that audit committee attributes have the highest impact on compliance with IFRS and financial reporting quality, and the collective effect of corporate governance mechanisms has not shifted to be more influential from Saudi GAAP to IFRS. The research provides valuable insights for regulators, stock markets, practitioners, and academicians in this area.
The present study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on compliance with IFRS and financial reporting quality in some selected Gulf countries. The study aims to investigate this issue using a sample of 98 firms listed in Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates over the period from 2015 up to 2018. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis are conducted to estimate the results. The results reveal that audit committee attributes have a higher impact on compliance with IFRS and financial reporting quality than other corporate governance mechanisms. Further, the results show that there is no evidence to support that the collective effect of corporate governance mechanisms has changed to be more influential from Saudi GAAP to IFRS. The present study has several contributions and implications. It has a unique contribution as it attempts to compare the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality and compliance with IFRS among a recent IFRS adopter; Saudi Arabia and early IFRS adopters; Oman and the United Arab Emirates. The study opens valuable insights to regulators, stock markets, practitioners, and academicians in this issue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据