4.7 Article

Asymmetric Bounded Neural Control for an Uncertain Robot by State Feedback and Output Feedback

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2901277

关键词

Neural networks; Adaptive systems; Nonlinear systems; Manipulator dynamics; Uncertainty; adaptive control; asymmetrically bounded inputs; neural networks; robotic manipulator

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873298, 61873268, 61633016, 61751310, 61573147]
  2. Anhui Science and Technology Major Program [17030901029]
  3. Beijing Science and Technology Project [Z181100003118006]
  4. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [L182060]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/S001913]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive neural bounded control scheme is proposed for an n-link rigid robotic manipulator with unknown dynamics, guaranteeing tracking performance and compensating for unknown robotic dynamics. The designed controller bounds are known a priori and determined by controller gains, applicable within actuator limitations, with all signals ultimately bounded uniformly proven via Lyapunov stability theory. Simulations verify the effectiveness of the scheme.
In this paper, an adaptive neural bounded control scheme is proposed for an n-link rigid robotic manipulator with unknown dynamics. With the combination of the neural approximation and backstepping technique, an adaptive neural network control policy is developed to guarantee the tracking performance of the robot. Different from the existing results, the bounds of the designed controller are known a priori, and they are determined by controller gains, making them applicable within actuator limitations. Furthermore, the designed controller is also able to compensate the effect of unknown robotic dynamics. Via the Lyapunov stability theory, it can be proved that all the signals are uniformly ultimately bounded. Simulations are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据