4.5 Review

Multiomics landscape of synovial fibroblasts in rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

INFLAMMATION AND REGENERATION
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s41232-021-00157-8

关键词

Rheumatoid arthritis; Synovial fibroblasts; Integrated analysis; Genome; Epigenome; Transcriptome; Genome analysis; Single-cell analysis; DNA methylation; Histone acetylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the epigenomic abnormalities in RASFs and highlights the recent advances in single-cell analysis, emphasizing the potential of SFs as targets for safer and more effective therapies against RA.
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by tumor-like hyperplasia and inflammation of the synovium, which causes synovial cell invasion into the bone and cartilage. In RA pathogenesis, various molecules in effector cells (i.e., immune cells and mesenchymal cells) are dysregulated by genetic and environmental factors. Synovial fibroblasts (SFs), the most abundant resident mesenchymal cells in the synovium, are the major local effectors of the destructive joint inflammation and exert their effects through the pathogenic production of molecules such as interleukin-6. Main body To date, more than 100 RA susceptibility loci have been identified in genome-wide association studies (GWASs), and finding novel therapeutic targets utilizing genome analysis is considered a promising approach because some candidate causal genes identified by GWASs have previously been established as therapeutic targets. For further exploration of RA-responsible cells and cell type-specific therapeutic targets, integrated analysis (or functional genome analysis) of the genome and intermediate traits (e.g., transcriptome and epigenome) is crucial. Conclusion This review builds on the existing knowledge regarding the epigenomic abnormalities in RASFs and discusses the recent advances in single-cell analysis, highlighting the prospects of SFs as targets for safer and more effective therapies against RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据