4.5 Article

The De-Icing Comparison Experiment (D-ICE): a study of broadband radiometric measurements under icing conditions in the Arctic

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1205-1224

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-1205-2021

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA Arctic Research Program
  2. NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL)
  3. DoE Atmospheric Systems Research (ASR) program [DE-SC0013306, DE-AC36-08GO283]
  4. DoE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office
  5. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface-based measurements of solar and infrared radiative fluxes using thermopile radiometers are commonly affected by ice formation on sensor windows in cold environments. In an effort to reduce this measurement uncertainty, a De-Icing Comparison Experiment (DICE) was conducted in Alaska to evaluate ventilation and heating technologies, resulting in successful mitigation of ice formation in the majority of cases.
Surface-based measurements of broadband shortwave (solar) and longwave (infrared) radiative fluxes using thermopile radiometers are made regularly around the globe for scientific and operational environmental monitoring. The occurrence of ice on sensor windows in cold environments - whether snow, rime, or frost - is a common problem that is difficult to prevent as well as difficult to correct in post-processing. The Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) community recognizes radiometer icing as a major outstanding measurement uncertainty. Towards constraining this uncertainty, the De-Icing Comparison Experiment (DICE) was carried out at the NOAA Atmospheric Baseline Observatory in Utqia.gvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, from August 2017 to July 2018. The purpose of D-ICE was to evaluate existing ventilation and heating technologies developed to mitigate radiometer icing. D-ICE consisted of 20 pyranometers and 5 pyrgeometers operating in various ventilator housings alongside operational systems that are part of NOAA's Barrow BSRN station and the US Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program North Slope of Alaska and Oliktok Point observatories. To detect icing, radiometers were monitored continuously using cameras, with a total of more than 1 million images of radiometer domes archived. Ventilator and ventilator-heater performance overall was skillful with the average of the systems mitigating ice formation 77% (many >90 %) of the time during which icing conditions were present. Ventilators without heating elements were also effective and capable of providing heat through roughly equal contributions of waste energy from the ventilator fan and adiabatic heating downstream of the fan. This provided similar to 0.6 degrees C of warming, enough to subsaturate the air up to a relative humidity (with respect to ice) of similar to 105 %. Because the mitigation technologies performed well, a near complete record of verified icefree radiometric fluxes was assembled for the duration of the campaign. This well-characterized data set is suitable for model evaluation, in particular for the Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) first Special Observing Period (SOP1). We used the data set to calculate short- and long-term biases in iced sensors, finding that biases can be up to + 60 W m(-2) (longwave) and 211 to + 188 W m(-2) (shortwave). However, because of the frequency of icing, mitigation of ice by ventilators, cloud conditions, and the timing of icing relative to available sunlight, the biases in the monthly means were generally less than the aggregate uncertainty attributed to other conventional sources in both the shortwave and longwave. Copyright statement. The US Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据