4.7 Article

Luminescence, chiroptical, magnetic and ab initio crystal-field characterizations of an enantiopure helicoidal Yb(iii) complex

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0qi01194k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (SMMCPL) [ANR-19-CE29-0012-02]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC-CoG MULTIPROSMM) [725184]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-19-CE29-0012] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic structure of a chiral Yb(iii)-based complex has been fully determined through a combination of experimental magnetic, luminescence, and chiroptical characterizations with ab initio wavefunction calculations. The high resolution electronic structure diagram and the nature of different states involved in the magnetic and chiroptical properties have been identified. Spectroscopic measurements were used to reproduce the magnetic properties, while advanced ab initio calculations revealed that global chiroptical spectra are a sum of entangled transitions with similar or opposite polarizations.
The electronic structure of a chiral Yb(iii)-based complex is fully determined by taking advantage of experimental magnetic, luminescence, and chiroptical (NIR-ECD and CPL) characterizations in combination with ab initio wavefunction calculations. The combined use of these techniques allows determining with high resolution the electronic structure diagram as well as the nature of the different states involved in the magnetic and chiroptical properties of the investigated complex. The crystal-field picture deduced from spectroscopic measurements (absorption and emission) is used to reproduce the magnetic properties. Subsequently, advanced ab initio calculations demonstrate that global chiroptical spectra correspond to the sum of entangled transitions with similar or opposite polarizations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据