4.6 Article

Factors affecting the negative Poisson's ratio of black phosphorus and black arsenic: electronic effects

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 3441-3446

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05005a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [2017B030306003, 2019B1515120078]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11804057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative Poisson's ratio (NPR) materials are widely used in engineering due to their good resistance to shear, denting, and fracture. The NPR phenomenon in 2D single-layer materials can be explained by both mechanical principles and electronic effects, with hinge structures playing a crucial role in determining the inherent NPR.
Negative Poisson's ratio (NPR) materials (when stretched longitudinally, the thickness of these materials increases along the lateral direction) are widely used in engineering because of their good resistance to shear, denting, and fracture. Observance of a negative Poisson's ratio (NPR) in two-dimensional (2D) single-layer materials presently has two explanations. The first, from mechanical principles, is that it derives from the presence of a special structure (hinge structure), such as in single-layer black phosphorus (BP) or black arsenic (beta-As). The second, from electronic effects, is that it derives from (non-hinge-like) planar honeycomb structures and transition-metal dichalcogenides, MX2. Through first-principle calculations, we show that 2D single-layer materials with a hinge structure also have distinct electronic effects, similar to those observed from 2D planar honeycomb materials. Under strain, electronic effects of Px orbitals lead to the inherent NPR of the 2D single-layer material with a hinge structure. We discuss the influencing factors of the hinge structure on the NPR and demonstrate that the electronic effects inside the hinge structure are the fundamental factor in determining the inherent NPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据