4.4 Article

Examining the Effects of a Pedagogical Agent With Dual-Channel Emotional Cues on Learner Emotions, Cognitive Load, and Knowledge Transfer Performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 1114-1134

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0735633121992421

关键词

pedagogical agent; emotion; dual-channel assumption; multimedia learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772012, 61977035]
  2. Ministry of Culture and Tourism of China [20201194075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that learners assigned to the affective pedagogical agent reported higher emotional levels and higher instructional efficiency. While there were no significant differences in perceived task difficulty among groups, learners with the affective pedagogical agent performed better on the knowledge transfer test.
Despite the continuous emphasis on emotion in multimedia learning, it was still unclear how pedagogical agent emotional cues might affect learning. In the present study, a between-subjects experiment was performed to examine the effects of a pedagogical agent with dual-channel emotional cues on learners' emotions, cognitive load, and knowledge transfer performance. Participants from a central Chinese university (age mean = 21.26, N = 66) were randomly divided into three groups. These groups received instructions from an affective pedagogical agent, a neutral pedagogical agent, or a neutral voice narration without pedagogical agent embodiment. Results showed that learners assigned the affective pedagogical agent reported a significantly higher emotional level than learners assigned the neutral pedagogical agent. Learners' perceived task difficulty was not significantly different among groups while instructional efficiency was significantly higher for learners with the affective pedagogical agent. Moreover, learners assigned to the affective pedagogical agent performed significantly better on the knowledge transfer test than those assigned the neutral pedagogical agent or the neutral voice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据