4.4 Article

Evaluation of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction With Meibography in Patients With Rosacea

期刊

CORNEA
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 497-499

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000393

关键词

dry eye; ocular surface; meibomian gland dysfunction; meibography; ocular rosacea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the dry eye tests and meibography of patients with ocular rosacea. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 18 patients with ocular rosacea (group 1) and 38 eyes of 19 healthy individuals (group 2) were enrolled. Besides full-eye examination, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining and Oxford scoring, tear film break-up time, Schirmer 1 test, ocular surface disease index score assessment, and evaluation of upper and lower eyelid meibomian glands using infrared captures of an optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Spectralis HRA+OCT; Heidelberg Engineering) device were performed (grade 0: no loss of meibomian glands, grade 1: gland dropout area <1/3 of the total meibomian glands, grade 2: gland dropout area 1/3 to 2/3 of the total meibomian glands, grade 3: gland dropout >2/3 of the total meibomian glands). Results: The mean ages of group 1 and group 2 were 50.2 +/- 9.5 (range, 32-65), and 46.3 +/- 14.1 years (range, 25-70), respectively (P = 0.225). No significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity and meiboscores of upper eyelids were detected in between groups. Schirmer 1 and tear film break-up time in group 1 were significantly lower than in group 2 (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, respectively). Ocular surface disease index and Oxford scale scores and meiboscores of lower and total (upper +lower) eyelids were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (P = 0.04, P = 0.018, P < 0.001, P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: Ocular rosacea causes dry eye and significant meibomian gland loss that can objectively be demonstrated with meibography. The infrared camera of OCT-that is widely found in many ophthalmology departments-might be used to evaluate meibomian gland dysfunction in these individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据