4.3 Article

Intrinsic disorder is a common structural characteristic of RxLR effectors in oomycete pathogens

期刊

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 11, 页码 911-919

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.07.005

关键词

Phytophthora; Protein structure; Plant-pathogen interaction; Effector function

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501589, 31371894, 31625023]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571769]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrinsic disorder is common in nature and has been studied to play important biological roles in bacterial effectors. However, disorder in oomycete RxLR effectors has not been investigated previously and the roles are unknown. Our results of PONDR VL-XT disorder analysis showed that predicted oomycete RxLR effectors were significantly more disordered than other effectors and secretome. The distribution of disorder content presented preference that RxLR-dEER regions were enriched in disordered residues, suggesting potential role of disorder in effector translocation. In contrast, the disorder content was depleted in the C-terminal regions, especially for W/Y/L motifs. We also found that around 42 % of putative RxLR proteins were predicted to contain at least one alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition feature (alpha-MoRF), and most alpha-MoRFs were located in the C-terminal regions. Furthermore, both of the disorder mutants of PsAvh18 and PcAvh207 lost the cell death inducing activity, indicating the potential important role of disordered structure in RxLR effector function. Overall, these results demonstrate that intrinsic disorder is a common characteristic of oomycete RxLR proteins, and we postulate that such structure feature may be important for effector translocation or function. This study extends our understanding of RxLR effectors in protein structures, and opens up new directions to explore novel mechanisms of oomycete RxLR effectors. (C) 2017 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据