4.3 Review

Contribution of oxidative stress in the mechanisms of postoperative complications and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

期刊

REDOX REPORT
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 35-44

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13510002.2021.1891808

关键词

Surgery; oxidative stress; organ failure; sepsis; antioxidants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surgical complications following procedures have been studied for years, with oxidative stress playing a crucial role. The use of antioxidants is important in preventing and mitigating the damage caused by oxidative stress.
Background The extent of the damage following surgery has been subject of study for several years. Numerous surgical complications can impact postoperative quality of life of patients and even can cause mortality. Although these complications are generally due to multifactorial mechanisms, oxidative stress plays a key pathophysiological role. Moreover, oxidative stress could be an unavoidable effect derived even from the surgical procedure itself. Methods A systematic review was performed following an electronic search of Pubmed and ScienceDirect databases. Keywords such as sepsis, oxidative stress, organ dysfunction, antioxidants, outcomes in postoperative complications, among others, were used. Review articles were preferably used between the years 2015 onwards, not excluding older ones. Results The vast majority point to the role of oxidative stress in generating greater damage and worse prognosis in postoperative patients without the necessary care and precautions, taking importance on the use of antioxidants to prevent this problem. Discussions Oxidative stress represents a common final pathway related to pathological processes such as inflammation or ischemia-reperfusion, among others. The expression of greater severity of these complications can result in multiple organ dysfunction or sepsis. The aim of this study was to present an update of the role of oxidative stress on surgical postoperative complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据