4.6 Article

Performance Analysis of Coherent and Noncoherent Modulation Under I/Q Imbalance Effects

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 36125-36139

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028869

关键词

Modulation; Receivers; Signal to noise ratio; Fading channels; Interference; Radio frequency; Transceivers; I; Q imbalance; coherent detection; noncoherent detection; RF impairments; symbol error rate

资金

  1. Khalifa University [KU/RC1-C2PS-T2/8474000137, KU/FSU-8474000122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of IQI on the performance of different modulation schemes under multipath fading channels, proposing a comprehensive framework and mathematical expressions for analysis. The study shows that IQI compensation is crucial for ensuring reliable communication, as the effects of IQI on system performance vary and are significant in some cases.
In this paper, we investigate the effects of in-phase/quadrature-phase imbalance (IQI) on the performance of different modulation schemes under multipath fading channels. In particular, a comprehensive framework for the analysis of coherent and noncoherent modulation with IQI is proposed. Specifically, new moment generating function (MGF) expressions for both point-to-point and multiple antenna systems are derived for the cases of transmitter IQI, receiver IQI, and joint transmitter/receiver IQI. Based on the derived MGFs, new analytical expressions for the corresponding symbol error rate (SER) are derived and are subsequently used to provide deep insights into the effects of IQI on the system performance. It is shown that, while in some cases the SER performance degradation due to IQI is marginal, in other cases, this impairment is more pronounced. Accordingly, IQI compensation is of paramount importance as it can guarantee a reliable communication link. This is particularly important in demanding communication technologies where reduction of latency and complexity are essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据