4.7 Article

Study of quasi-two-body B(s)→φ(f0(980)/f2(1270)→)ππ decays in perturbative QCD approach

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08875-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11705159, 11975195, 11875033, 11765012]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province [ZR2018JL001, ZR2019JQ04]
  3. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province [9212218405]
  4. Research Fund of Jiangsu Normal University [HB2016004]
  5. Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [2019KJJ007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the calculated results in the perturbative QCD approach are consistent with experimental measurements, indicating the reliability of observations of these quasi-two-body decays. In addition, branching fractions of other quasi-two-body decays were also calculated based on the narrow-width approximation, with hopes of validation in future experiments.
In 2017, LHCb collaboration reported their first observation of the rare decays Bs -> phi (f0(980)/f2(1270)->)pi+pi- and the evidence of B0 -> phi (f0(980)/f2(1270)->)pi+pi-. Motivated by this, we study these quasi-two-body decays in the perturbative QCD approach. The branching fractions, CP asymmetries and the polarization fractions are calculated. We find that within the appropriate two-meson wave functions, the calculated branching fractions are in agreement with the measurements of LHCb. Based on the narrow-width approximation, We also calculate the branching fractions of the quasi-two-body Bd,s -> phi (f0(980)/f2(1270)->)pi 0 pi 0 and Bd,s -> phi (f2(1270)-> )K+K-, and hope the predictions to be tested in the ongoing LHCb and Belle II experiments. Moreover, the processes Bd,s -> phi f2(1270) are also analyzed under the approximation. We note that the CP asymmetries of these decays are very small, because these decays are either penguin dominant or pure penguin processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据