4.6 Article

Symmetry breaking induced magnon-magnon coupling in synthetic antiferromagnets

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.064429

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51871235]
  2. Project of Hebei Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [QN2019309]
  3. PhD Research Startup Foundation of Shijiazhuang University [20BS022]
  4. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hebei Province of China (S&T Program of Hebei) [A2019205310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a general theory of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectroscopy for symmetry-breaking synthetic antiferromagnets (SAFs) and discusses how inhomogeneity and different thickness of the two ferromagnetic sublayers of a SAF result in intrinsic symmetry breaking. It also explores how the symmetry breaking induced magnon-magnon coupling generates new frequency branches in FMR spectra.
We propose a general theory of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectroscopy for symmetry-breaking synthetic antiferromagnets (SAFs). Generally, both inhomogeneity and different thickness of the two ferromagnetic sublayers of a SAF result in the intrinsic symmetry breaking, thus excludes the crossing between pure inphase and out-of-phase resonance modes with opposite parity. Alternatively, new frequency branches become hybridization of original bare modes in terms of symmetry breaking induced magnon-magnon coupling, hence generate an indirect gap in FMR frequencies. The gap widths for several typical cases are presented and compared with existing data. In particular, for the inhomogeneity case, the indirect gap width is linearly proportional to the asymmetry degree and takes a square (rather than linear) dependence on the magnon-magnon coupling strength, indicating a case-by-case recalibration of the measuring method of the latter. Our theory provides a simple but physical understanding of the rich structure of FMR spectra for asymmetric SAFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据