4.2 Review

Challenges and Opportunities for Real-World Evidence in Metastatic Luminal Breast Cancer

期刊

BREAST CARE
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 108-114

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000515701

关键词

Breast cancer; Luminal; Metastasis; PRAEGNANT; Real-world evidence

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Celgene
  3. Roche
  4. translational research resources (TRRs) in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the University of Erlangen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PRAEGNANT Network aims to optimize oncological care for patients with metastatic breast cancer by systematically recording medical care, monitoring quality-of-life changes during therapy, and identifying patients eligible for clinical studies. It also allows targeted therapies based on the molecular structures of breast carcinomas.
Background: The therapeutic armamentarium for patients with metastatic breast cancer is becoming more and more specific. Recommendations from clinical trials are not available for all treatment situations and patient subgroups, and it is therefore important to collect real-world data. Summary: To develop recommendations for up-to-date treatments and participation in clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer, the Prospective Academic Translational Research PRAEGNANT Network was established to optimize the quality of oncological care in the advanced therapeutic setting. The main aim of PRAEGNANT is to systematically record medical care for patients with metastatic breast cancer in the real-life setting, including the outcome and side effects of different treatment strategies, to monitor quality-of-life changes during therapy, to identify patients eligible for participation in clinical studies, and to allow targeted therapies based on the molecular structures of breast carcinomas. Key Messages: This article describes the PRAEGNANT network and sheds light on the question of whether the various end points from clinical trials can be transferred to the real-world treatment situation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据