3.8 Article

Water Quality and Radionuclides Content Assessment of the Al-Najaf Sea: Case Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 262-271

出版社

POLISH SOC ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.12911/22998993/131183

关键词

irrigation water; water quality assessment; salinity; sodicity; radionuclides; Al-Najaf Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the water quality in Al-Najaf state, finding that both groundwater and surface water are classified as very high salinity and sodium water, unsuitable for irrigation.
The Al-Najaf state is witnessing an increased economic development and attracting more investments that require the development of new areas and exploring new water resources. This study evaluates the quality of 12 surface water samples and groundwater from 12 wells for irrigation according to the salinity and sodicity hazards based on electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). In addition, the concentrations of radionuclides, which include Thorium (Th-232), Uranium (U-238), Potassium (K-40) and Cesium (Cs-137) were tested in four soil samples in the study area. It was found that the average values of pH, total hardness, Na, Ca, Mg, K, Cl, SO4, NO3 for groundwater and surface water were 8 and 6, 2287 and 4006 mg/L, 1140 and 1232 mg/L, 378 and 637 mg/L, 327 and 587 mg/L, 2 and 2 mg/L, 989 and 2007 mg/L, 1149 and 1325 mg/L, as well as 2 and 2 mg/L, respectively. From salinity and sodicity hazards analysis, the groundwater had EC of 5242 mu S/cm and SAR of 61, whereas surface water had EC of 6253 mu S/cm and SAR of 50. Furthermore, the concentrations of radionuclides, i.e. Th-232, U-238, K-40 and Cs-137 in the soil samples were found to be 11.02, 34.12, 544.45, and 1.6 Bq/kg, respectively. The concentrations of radionuclides were within the worldwide baseline, expect for K-40. The study concluded that both water sources are classified as very high salinity and sodium water (class C4-S4), and it cannot be used for irrigation, only suitable for the salt tolerant crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据