4.7 Article

How feathered are birds? Environment predicts both the mass and density of body feathers

期刊

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 701-712

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13019

关键词

birds; comparative analysis; feather density; feather mass; thermoinsulation; waterproofing

类别

资金

  1. Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS)
  2. National Research, Development and Innovative Office of Hungary [121166]
  3. Swedish Research Council [637-2013-7442]
  4. Tempus Public Foundation [MAEO2016_15/76740, CMP-69-2/2016]
  5. Hungarian Research Fund [OTKA K113108]
  6. Romanian Ministry of Education [PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies modelling heat transfer of bird plumage design suggest that insulative properties can be attributed to the density and structure of the downy layer, whereas waterproofing is the result of the outer layer, comprised of contour feathers. In this study, we test how habitat and thermal condition affect feather mass and density of body feathers (contour, semiplume and downy feathers) measured on the ventral and dorsal sides of the body, using a phylogenetic comparative analysis of 152 bird species. Our results demonstrate that feather mass and the density of downy feathers are higher in species that inhabit colder environments, whereas total feather density is higher of species breeding under intermediate temperatures compared to the ones breeding under more extreme conditions. The density of contour feathers, depending on the body region, is either quadratically related or negatively correlated with minimum winter temperature. The density of contour and downy feathers, measured on both sides of the body, is higher in aquatic than in terrestrial birds. However, among the former, diving behaviour does not select for further increases in body feather mass or density. The results of this study provides key insights into how the plumage of birds is adapted to different environments and lifestyles and provides a basis for understanding the diverse range and the evolution of variation in these characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据