4.6 Article

Danish Dwellings with Cold Attics-Ventilation Rates and Air Exchange between Attic and Dwelling

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11020064

关键词

natural ventilation; cold attics; air change rate; air exchange; moisture; convection; mould

资金

  1. Kerrn-Jespersen fond and Realdania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naturally ventilated cold attics are traditional in many Danish single-family homes, with the moisture balance dependent on sufficient ventilation. Airtight ceilings are vital for reducing excess moisture and preventing mould growth and health risks. The study highlights the importance of airtight ceilings for both dwelling and attic performance.
Naturally ventilated cold attics are traditional in many Danish single-family homes. The moisture balance of these attics is dependent on sufficient ventilation for removal of excess moisture. Moisture is generated in the dwelling below, and transported to attic spaces through convection and diffusion. Therefore, airtight ceilings are vital for reduction of excess moisture, which may yield mould growth in the attic. If mould spores migrate to the dwelling it can cause risk of health concerns for occupants. The presents study includes analysis of tracer gas and temperature/relative humidity measurements, in 30 dwellings/attics. The measurements yielded results of both air change rates in attics and dwellings, as well as air exchange between the two zones. Four of 30 houses, met the recommended air change rate of 0.5 h(-1), and only in summer. The air change rate in the attics was found to be higher, and with larger variation compared to the dwelling. Visible mould growth was found in three attics, which all exhibited low air change rates. Air exchange between zones occurred in houses both with and without vapour barriers. The downward air exchange in summer, was however slightly larger in cases without vapour barriers. These results highlight the importance of airtight ceilings for both dwelling and attic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据