4.7 Article

Simultaneous NO and mercury removal over MnOx/TiO2 catalyst in different atmospheres

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 282-290

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.06.011

关键词

MnOx/TiO2; SCR catalyst; No; Mercury; Atmosphere

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program (973) of China [2014CB238904]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51506066, 51376074]
  3. China postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M582222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, manganese oxides supported on titania was prepared by sol-gel method and employed as SCR catalyst for simultaneous NO and mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas. The simultaneous NO and Hg-0 conversion rate on MnOx/TiO2 was evaluated in different atmospheres, and the interaction between denitration and demercuration was investigated. The results indicated that MnOx/TiO2 had good activity in simultaneously removing NO and Hg-0 in SCR atmosphere (NH3 + NO + O-2 + N-2). However, both NO conversion and Hg-0 removal efficiency were inhibited in simulated coal combustion flue gas compared to that in SCR atmosphere because of the presence of 502 leading to the generation of sulfite and sulfate on the catalyst. H2O in simulated coal combustion flue gas had negative effect on the catalytic performance as well. NO conversion in oxy-fuel combustion flue gas was lower than that in air combustion flue gas, while Hg-0 removal efficiency in oxy-fuel combustion flue gas was higher than that in air combustion flue gas. Hg displayed no obvious influence on NO conversion and N-2 selectivity over SCR process. And SCR atmosphere showed almost no inhibition to Hg-0 removal when the temperature was below 300 degrees C. At the optimal temperature for NO conversion (250 degrees C), the inhibition of SCR atmosphere on Hg-0 removal became stronger as the space velocity (GHSV) increased, but the inhibitive effect could be ignored when GHSV slowed down to 50,000 h(-1) or less. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据