期刊
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 3643-3666出版社
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
关键词
-
资金
- NASA [80NSSC18K0178, NNX17AK81G, 80NSSC20K0009, 1647811]
- NSFC [42007198]
- UK National Centre for Earth Observation [NE/R016518/1, NE/N018079/1]
This study conducts a global inverse analysis of 2010-2018 GOSAT observations to understand the factors controlling atmospheric methane. The results show discrepancies in prior estimates of fuel-related emissions and significant growth in anthropogenic methane emissions in certain regions. This research also highlights the impact of low OH concentrations, high fire emissions, and wetland emissions on methane growth rates during 2010-2018.
We conduct a global inverse analysis of 20102018 GOSAT observations to better understand the factors controlling atmospheric methane and its accelerating increase over the 2010-2018 period. The inversion optimizes anthropogenic methane emissions and their 20102018 trends on a 4 degrees x5 degrees grid, monthly regional wetland emissions, and annual hemispheric concentrations of tropospheric OH (the main sink of methane). We use an analytical solution to the Bayesian optimization problem that provides closedform estimates of error covariances and information content for the solution. We verify our inversion results with independent methane observations from the TCCON and NOAA networks. Our inversion successfully reproduces the interannual variability of the methane growth rate inferred from NOAA background sites. We find that prior estimates of fuel-related emissions reported by individual countries to the United Nations are too high for China (coal) and Russia (oil and gas) and too low for Venezuela (oil and gas) and the US (oil and gas). We show large 2010-2018 increases in anthropogenic methane emissions over South Asia, tropical Africa, and Brazil, coincident with rapidly growing livestock populations in these regions. We do not find a significant trend in anthro-pogenic emissions over regions with high rates of production or use of fossil methane, including the US, Russia, and Europe. Our results indicate that the peak methane growth rates in 2014-2015 are driven by low OH concentrations (2014) and high fire emissions (2015), while strong emissions from tropical (Amazon and tropical Africa) and boreal (Eurasia) wetlands combined with increasing anthropogenic emissions drive high growth rates in 2016-2018. Our best estimate is that OH did not contribute significantly to the 2010-2018 methane trend other than the 2014 spike, though error correlation with global anthropogenic emissions limits confidence in this result.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据