3.8 Article

Citizens appreciate talking about death and learning end-of-life care - a mixed-methods study on views and experiences of 5469 Last Aid Course participants

期刊

PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 140-148

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590

关键词

Palliative care; Public awareness; End-of-life care; Home death; Compassionate communities; Last Aid Course; Public palliative care education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that Last Aid Courses are both feasible and accepted by citizens from different countries. Participants highly rated the courses and believed that the content and discussions could potentially increase willingness and ability to engage in home care.
Background: Most people would prefer to die at home. Engaging citizens in end-of-life care may contribute to making home death possible for more people. Aims: To test the feasibility and acceptability of Last Aid Courses in different countries and to explore the views and experiences of participants with the course. Methods: International multi-centre study with a questionnaire based mixed methods design. 408 Last Aid Courses were held in three different countries. Of 6014 course participants, 5469 participated in the study accounting for a response rate of 91%. Results: The median age of participants was 56 years. 88% were female. 76% of participants rated the course very good. 99% would recommend it to others. . Findings from the qualitative data revealed that participants found the atmosphere comfortable; instructors competent; appreciated the course format, duration, topics and discussions about life and death. Conclusions: Last Aid Courses are both feasible and accepted by citizens from different countries. They have a huge potential to inform citizens and to encourage them to engage in care at home. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of the course on the ability and willingness of participants to provide end-of-life care and the impact on the number of home-deaths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据