4.7 Article

Towards all-order factorization of QED amplitudes at next-to-leading power

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.034022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch NWO-I program, Higgs as Probe and Portal [156]
  2. D-ITP consortium, a program of NWO - Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW)
  3. Fellini-Fellowship for Innovation at INFN - European Union's Horizon 2020 research programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Cofund Action [754496]
  4. ERC [ERC-STG-2015-67732]
  5. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA16201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We extend the factorization of Abelian gauge theory amplitudes to the next-to-leading power (NLP) level in a soft scale expansion, introducing new universal jet functions and addressing endpoint divergences. This new factorization framework provides a first step towards a complete all-order description of gauge-theory amplitudes at NLP, considering virtual collinear modes and the interplay of nontrivial hard-collinear effects beyond one-loop level.
We generalize the factorization of Abelian gauge theory amplitudes to next-to-leading power (NLP) in a soft scale expansion, following a recent generalization for Yukawa theory. From an all-order power counting analysis of leading and next-to-leading regions, we infer the factorized structure for both a parametrically small and zero fermion mass. This requires the introduction of new universal jet functions, for nonradiative and single-radiative QED amplitudes, which we compute at one-loop order. We show that our factorization formula reproduces the relevant regions in one- and two-loop scattering amplitudes, appropriately addressing endpoint divergences. It provides a description of virtual collinear modes and accounts for nontrivial hard-collinear interplay present beyond the one-loop level, making this a first step toward a complete all-order factorization framework for gauge-theory amplitudes at NLP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据