4.2 Article

Measuring local moire lattice heterogeneity of twisted bilayer graphene

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013153

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC StG SpinMelt) [758572]
  2. Dutch Research Council (NWO), as part of the Frontiers of Nanoscience program
  3. Vidi grant (Vidi talent scheme) [680-47-536]
  4. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain through the Severo Ochoa program for Centres of Excellence in RD [SE5-0522]
  5. Fundacio Privada Cellex
  6. Fundacio Privada Mir-Puig
  7. Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA program [820378]
  8. Generalitat de Catalunya through the Horizon 2020 program [820378]
  9. La Caixa Foundation
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [758572] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method is introduced to continuously map inhomogeneities of a moire lattice on twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) and it is found that the variation in twist angle has a significant effect on the electronic structure.
We introduce a new method to continuously map inhomogeneities of a moire lattice and apply it to large-area topographic images we measure on open-device twisted bilayer graphene (TBG). We show that the variation in the twist angle of a TBG device, which is frequently conjectured to be the reason for differences between devices with a supposed similar twist angle, is about 0.08 degrees around the average of 2.02 degrees over areas of several hundred nanometers, comparable to devices encapsulated between hexagonal boron nitride slabs. We distinguish between an effective twist angle and local anisotropy and relate the latter to heterostrain. Our results imply that for our devices, twist angle heterogeneity has an effect on the electronic structure roughly equal to that of local strain. The method introduced here is applicable to results from different imaging techniques and on different moire materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据