4.7 Article

Nutraceutical Content and Daily Value Contribution of Sweet Potato Accessions for the European Market

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7020023

关键词

Ipomoea batatas; nutrients requirement; β -carotene; vitamin A; minerals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the quality and nutrient contents variability among different accessions of sweet potatoes, finding that deep-orange-fleshed sweet potatoes have the highest content of beta-carotene, and purple ecotypes have significantly higher total phenolic content. Additionally, some accessions have magnesium and phosphorus content reaching 20% or higher of the daily value.
Sweet potatoes (SPs) are considered by the FAO as a primary crop for traditional agriculture in the tropics, but in Europe, its consumption is not widespread. However, consumer demand has grown exponentially over the past five years. This study has evaluated the quality and nutrient contents of storage roots of 29 SPs accessions to characterize their role in improving the human diet. Roots were analyzed for nutraceuticals, sugars, and minerals. Results underlined a considerable variability of nutrient content related to color among SPs accessions. The deep-orange-fleshed SPs showed a higher content of beta-carotene compared to the light orange- and cream-fleshed ones; 100 g of edible product of HON86 can supply 32.3% of the daily value contribution of vitamin A, followed by the pale orange-fleshed BRA32 and BRA54. The total phenolic content of the purple ecotypes was about two to five times higher than the other genotypes. The calcium content was generally low, whereas, in many accessions, magnesium and phosphorus content reached 20%, or higher of the contribution to the daily value. Such a high variability suggests different use of the different accessions according to their strengths, but might also be used for breeding to improve quality traits of the commercial varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据