4.7 Article

Effects of hydrogen direct injection strategy on characteristics of lean-burn hydrogen-gasoline engines

期刊

FUEL
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 602-611

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.059

关键词

Hydrogen-gasoline engine; Hydrogen direct injection; Lean burn; Combustion; Emission

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276079]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control of Jilin University [20120109]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20110061110032]
  4. Project of Jilin Province Science and Technology development [20150101036JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the effects of hydrogen direct injection strategies on the characteristics of combustion and emissions of hydrogen-gasoline engines, an experimental engine platform was built with gasoline intake injection and hydrogen direct injection. The effects of hydrogen injection pressure and injection timing at a minimum advance for the best torque on the characteristics of engine combustion and emissions were studied at a constant engine speed, air-fuel ratio, and hydrogen fraction. The test results showed that when the heat that was released in the cylinder was constant, a 10% hydrogen fraction had a significant influence on the engine's performance, combustion, and emissions. Hydrogen direct injection greatly improved the combustion stability of lean-burn mixtures of the engine, and significantly improved the mean effective pressure and thermal efficiency. Hydrogen injection at optimum ignition timing would significantly shorten the flame-development period and rapid combustion duration. The heat release was more concentrated, which increased the cylinder pressure. With an excess air ratio of 1.5, the addition of hydrogen significantly reduced CO emissions, but HC emissions increased slightly. A lean burn could contribute to the reduction of NOx emissions, whereas the addition of hydrogen would increase it. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据