4.7 Article

A statistical approach to small area synthetic population generation as a basis for carless evacuation planning

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102902

关键词

Synthetic population; Archimedean copulas; Accessibility; Car-ownership models; Evacuation planning; Low income; Carless

资金

  1. US DOT Urban Mobility and Equity Center at Morgan State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evacuation plans often overlook low-income carless residents, leaving them stranded in emergencies. To improve emergency planning, identifying and locating these disadvantaged populations is crucial to providing necessary services and facilities.
Natural or man-made hazards that require evacuation put already vulnerable populations in a more precarious situation. However, when plans and decisions about evacuation are made, the assumption of access to a private car is typically made and differences in income levels across a community is rarely accounted for. The result is that carless members of a community can find themselves stranded. Low income carless residents need alternative transportation means to reach shelters in case of an emergency. Thus, evacuation plans, decisions and models need necessary information that identifies and locates these populations. In this paper, data from the American Community Survey, US Census, Internal Revenue Services and the National Household Travel Survey are used to generate synthetic population for Anne Arundel County, Maryland using the copula concept. Geographic locations of low-income residents are identified within each subarea of the county (census tract) and their car ownership is estimated with a binomial logit model. The developed population synthesis method will allow officials to have a more accurate account of disadvantaged populations for emergency planning and identify locations of shelters, triage points as well as planning carless transportation services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据