4.7 Article

Additive influence on quenching distances and critical ignition energies of ethylene-air mixtures

期刊

FUEL
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 401-410

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.065

关键词

Ethylene; Additive; Quenching distance; Baric coefficient; Critical ignition energy; Overall kinetic parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quenching distances of the stoichiometric ethylene-air mixture diluted with argon, nitrogen or carbon dioxide of variable mole fractions within 0.04 and 0.50 were measured at various initial pressures between 20 and 110 kPa using inductive-capacitive sparks produced between flanged electrodes. The pressure dependence of the quenching distance was described by a power function and the corresponding baric coefficients were evaluated by non-linear regression analysis. The experimental quenching distances were compared with those calculated from a model based on the assumption that the critical size of the flame is attained when the rate of heat production equals the rate of heat loss associated with the expansion work during incipient flame growth. The necessary data were taken from literature. The quenching distances d(q) measured for various compositions and initial pressures of the flammable mixtures were also used to evaluate the threshold or critical ignition energies H-min based on a correlation of the form H-min, = k . p(0) . d(q)(3), where p(0) is the initial pressure and k = 0.445 is a proportionality constant. The evaluated critical ignition energies matched well the literature data for hydrocarbons, determined by capacitive sparks. The overall kinetic parameters of ethylene combustion (reaction order and activation energy) were determined from the pressure or average flame temperature dependence of quenching distance. The quenching distances, critical ignition energies and overall kinetic parameters were discussed in connection with the amount and nature of added inert. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据