3.8 Proceedings Paper

Development of antifungal biocomposite film against postharvest pathogens Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Lasiodiplodia theobromae

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 1113-1120

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.356

关键词

Postharvest losses; Prosopis juliflora; Acacia albida; Supercritical fluid extract; Aqueous extract

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India under India and South African Bilateral project collaboration program [DST/INT/South Africa/P-07/2014]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa under India and South African Bilateral project collaboration program [DST/INT/South Africa/P-07/2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to reduce postharvest losses in mangoes, bio composite films with antifungal activity were developed. These films showed good antifungal activity, tensile strength, and elongation after testing.
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Lasiodiplodia theobromae are the two main causative agents for the postharvest losses in mango, through anthracnose and stem-end rot disease, respectively. Reduction of these losses using antifungal agents was attempted by developing biocomposite films based on polyvinyl alcohol reinforced with cellulosic fibres incorporated with antifungal extracts. Thereafter, individual films were incorporated with aqueous (3 mg/ml) and supercritical fluid (SCF) [1000 mu L] extracts of Prosopis juliflora and Acacia albida which gave the maximum inhibition in the antifungal assay of the extract against the selected pathogens. The developed films were tested for antifungal activity, tensile strength, and elongation. The films retain their antifungal activity after incorporation and also maintained significant tensile strength and elongation for a biocomposite packaging film. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Symposium on Nanostructured, Nanoengineered and Advanced Materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据