4.7 Article

Destruction of decabromodiphenyl ether during incineration of plastic television housing waste at commercial-scale industrial waste incineration plants

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105172

关键词

Home appliance recycling; Decabromodiphenyl ether; Destruction efficiency; Bromine; Plastic waste

资金

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Funds of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan [3K163005, JPMEERF20193001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlled co-incineration is an effective method for destroying DecaBDE, with over 99.9999% destruction efficiency achieved. However, proper disposal of bottom and fly ash is crucial to avoid environmental and human impacts.
To investigate the destruction of decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) contained in flame-retarded plastics, we conducted a series of co-incineration tests of plastic television (TV) housing waste at two commercial-scale industrial waste incinerators in Japan, one equipped with a rotary kiln furnace and the other with a stoker furnace. At the former, crushed TV housings containing 5.9% (59,000 mg/kg) decaBDE were mixed at 3.2 wt% with normal industrial waste and incinerated at 1000 degrees C; at the latter, crushed housings containing 4.9% (49,000 mg/ kg) decaBDE were mixed at 3.6 wt% with normal industrial waste and incinerated at 1100 degrees C. Destruction efficiencies of over 99.9999% were achieved at both plants, and discharge of brominated dioxins and furans was negligible. More than 70% of the total decaBDE output and 90% of the total bromine output were found in the bottom ash and the fly ash, respectively, suggesting that any undecomposed decaBDE was discharged into the bottom ash and that desorbed bromine was concentrated into the fly ash. Our findings indicate that controlled co-incineration is an environmentally sound method for destruction of decaBDE, but attention should be paid to disposing of the bottom and fly ash in a manner that avoids environmental and human impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据