4.6 Review

Ru-tweaking of non-precious materials: the tale of a strategy that ensures both cost and energy efficiency in electrocatalytic water splitting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 6710-6731

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta12424a

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS, Japan [JP19F18346]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review highlights the recent developments and research trends in utilizing Ru catalyst in water electrolysis, discussing its performance and mechanisms. Strategies for improving the water splitting catalyst performance by tweaking Ru are proposed.
Most better performing water splitting electrocatalysts are scarce, and their use increases the cost of production of H(2)via electrolysis. Among the best performing noble/precious metal electrocatalysts, Ru is most notable because it acts as an excellent electrocatalyst for both oxidation and reduction reactions of water responsible for the H-2 production. In fact, Ru outperforms Pt/C as the state-of-the-art water reduction electrocatalyst in alkali. However, the cost-wise more expensive Ru (than Pt and Ir) could not be extensively used in water electrolysis to avoid further increase in the cost of H-2 production. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in Ru and is being intensively investigated with various structural and chemical modifications at the nano-level for catalytic water electrolysis with and without other materials. However, there is no comprehensive review that summarizes and analyzes recent developments in water splitting electrocatalysts that are modulated with Ru. Hence, this review is devoted to bringing out the strategies involved in harvesting the best of water splitting electrocatalysts by Ru-tweaking. The same is also benchmarked against their performance at different conditions. Besides, a detailed note on water splitting electrocatalysis and mechanisms involving Ru are given with insights on the phenomena that make it an active interface for water electrolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据