4.7 Article

Objective functions for information-theoretical monitoring network design: what is optimal?

期刊

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 831-850

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/hess-25-831-2021

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC discovery grant [RGPIN-2016-04256]
  2. NSERC CGS -Doctoral award [CGSD2-535466-2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the optimal monitoring network layout using information-theoretical methods. A single-objective optimization of joint entropy is sufficient to maximize the collection of information, and it is shown that no greedy approach can guarantee to reach the global optimum.
This paper concerns the problem of optimal monitoring network layout using information-theoretical methods. Numerous different objectives based on information measures have been proposed in recent literature, often focusing simultaneously on maximum information and minimum dependence between the chosen locations for data collection stations. We discuss these objective functions and conclude that a single-objective optimization of joint entropy suffices to maximize the collection of information for a given number of stations. We argue that the widespread notion of minimizing redundancy, or dependence between monitored signals, as a secondary objective is not desirable and has no intrinsic justification. The negative effect of redundancy on total collected information is already accounted for in joint entropy, which measures total information net of any redundancies. In fact, for two networks of equal joint entropy, the one with a higher amount of redundant information should be preferred for reasons of robustness against failure. In attaining the maximum joint entropy objective, we investigate exhaustive optimization, a more computationally tractable greedy approach that adds one station at a time, and we introduce the greedy drop approach, where the full set of stations is reduced one at a time. We show that no greedy approach can exist that is guaranteed to reach the global optimum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据