4.3 Article

Non-subsumptive memory and narrative empathy

期刊

MEMORY STUDIES
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 24-40

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1750698020976458

关键词

cultural memorial forms; dialogical understanding; Gehen; ging; gegangen (Go; Went; Gone); Jenny Erpenbeck; narrative empathy; non-subsumptive memory

资金

  1. Academy of Finland project 'Instrumental Narratives: The Limits of Storytelling and New Story-Critical Narrative Theory' [314769]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [314769, 314769] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article emphasizes the importance of a model of non-subsumptive understanding in theorizing memory as a mode of generating meaning and understanding the other ethically. It develops a theory of non-subsumptive memory and narrative empathy while highlighting the significance of dialogical forms of understanding. The article envisions memory as a resource for learning and empathy towards others in processes of dialogical understanding.
This article shows the relevance of a model of non-subsumptive understanding for theorising memory as a mode of sense-making that can contribute to understanding the other in ethically sustainable ways. It develops a theory of non-subsumptive memory and narrative empathy. While understanding is often seen as a form of appropriation, assimilation, and subsumption of the singular under the general, a hermeneutic approach suggests that there are also non-subsumptive, non-appropriative, dialogical forms of understanding. In dialogue with Jenny Erpenbeck's novel Gehen, ging, gegangen (Go, Went, Gone), the article argues that cultural memorial forms, as (narrative) models of sense-making, tend to be productive when they adapt and change as they are applied to new situations and harmful when they subsume new experiences under fixed meaning templates. The article envisages memory as a resource for learning and other-oriented empathy in processes of dialogical understanding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据