4.0 Article

Occupational contact dermatitis in a gender perspective: North East Italian data 1996-2016

期刊

MEDICINA DEL LAVORO
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 34-43

出版社

MATTIOLI 1885
DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v112i1.9794

关键词

Occupational contact dermatitis; patch test; sex

资金

  1. UNIFARCO S.p.A. -Santa Giustina (BL) -Via Cal Longa, -Belluno Companies [58982]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found gender differences in the characteristics of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD), with females being diagnosed at a younger age and having a lower prevalence of irritant contact dermatitis. The most affected job categories varied between sexes, with healthcare professionals ranking highest for females and machinery mechanics for males. These differences may be attributed to factors such as the use of personal care products and outdoor work activities.
Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) ranks high among occupational diseases in Europe, but little is known as regards OCD and jobs in a gender perspective. Objectives: To evaluate sex prevalence of OCD according to occupational sectors and agents involved. 27381 patients (1996-2016) with suspected irritant/allergic contact dermatitis (ICD-ACD) were evaluated in North-Eastern Italy. Each patient underwent: a standardized questionnaire, a dermatologist/occupational physician evaluation and a patch test. Results: Females were younger at diagnosis (35.2 +/- 11.6 years vs 37.7 +/- 12.6 in males, p < 0.001) and had a lower ICD prevalence (OR 0.58, C.I. 95% 0.51 - 0.66, p < 0.001). Job categories most involved differed between sexes, with highest rank for healthcare professionals in females and machinery mechanics and filters for males. In females ACD percentage was higher in all job categories. Conclusions: OCD characteristics differ between sexes, according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Use of personal care products, housekeeping products and outdoor work activities may account for different sensitization profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据